 Topic: Second consideration: "Stat-exchange ticket" |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Would you like a "stat exchange item" implemented? |
| YES! And I'll sign the petition 31 times, ho! |
|
48% |
[ 18 ] |
| Yes, but the cost doesn't sounds very reasonable... |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
| Yes, but I doubt this is possible/will likely happen ;-; |
|
10% |
[ 4 ] |
| Yeah sure, but this shouldn't...really be a priority. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Doesn't matter to me, I probably wouldn't use it./I don't care. |
|
8% |
[ 3 ] |
| No. Too much work, won't be used at all, it just has no point. |
|
29% |
[ 11 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 37 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Monochrome
Joined: 29 May 2010
Posts: 821
|
 Post subject: |
 |
|
| I didn't say I was against the idea. I'd love to have Incubus Horns that weren't useless. |
|
| Fri Feb 04, 2011 5:41 pm |
|
| Author |
Message |
Toft
Joined: 23 Apr 2008
Posts: 466
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
|
| Post subject: |
|
|
| RomValeth wrote: | | Glenfiddich wrote: | | It's basically wows reforging system. RO has stolen so much off wow it's not funny haha. |
+20000000
You win the game.... Thats how right you are... |
But then again, WoW has stolen so many things from so many other games. |
|
| Fri Feb 04, 2011 6:17 pm |
|
| Author |
Message |
Monochrome
Joined: 29 May 2010
Posts: 821
|
| Post subject: |
|
|
| Not to mention that RO came out way before WoW. |
|
| Fri Feb 04, 2011 9:12 pm |
|
| Author |
Message |
Scarling
Joined: 11 Dec 2010
Posts: 115
|
| Post subject: |
|
|
not to mention its not really even like the reforging system in wow ;x
_________________
Scarling / Snatch / Darkshines / Sindelle / Stinky Pinky etc |
|
| Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:36 pm |
|
| Author |
Message |
EdgarGrimfang
Joined: 07 Mar 2010
Posts: 583
Location: The Internet
|
| Post subject: |
|
|
Not to mention not to mention.
_________________
"The World will know that free men stood against a tyrant. That few, stood against many, and before this battle was over, that even a God-King can bleed." -Leonidas to Xerxes |
|
| Fri Feb 04, 2011 11:30 pm |
|
| Author |
Message |
GRANDPA DREADNAUGHT
Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Posts: 641
|
| Post subject: |
|
|
Mentioning not to mention mentioning.
_________________
| EdgarGrimfang wrote: |
Because that good sir, would make sense, and thus defuse the entire argument. |
| EdgarGrimfang wrote: | Remember kids, Cigarettes are alot like hamsters. Utterly harmless to have until placed into your mouth, and lit on fire.
Don't smoke hamsters kids. |
|
|
| Sat Feb 05, 2011 12:33 am |
|
| Author |
Message |
smx123
Joined: 08 Apr 2010
Posts: 31
|
| Post subject: |
|
|
good idea, you wearing white butterfly wings and your element is shadow LOL  ) |
|
| Sat Feb 05, 2011 7:44 am |
|
| Author |
Message |
Glenfiddich
Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Posts: 1735
Location: Australia, Brisbane
|
| Post subject: |
|
|
| Scarling wrote: | | not to mention its not really even like the reforging system in wow ;x |
The original suggestion is the same as the reforging system.
I dont mind the idea. But as someone said, half the tactics of the game is knowing what your opponent is using and being smart enough to counteract that.
_________________
Characters-
Glenfiddich; 255- Professor
Jager Bomb; 255- Creator
Rammstein; 255- Creator |
|
| Sat Feb 05, 2011 8:57 am |
|
| Author |
Message |
luzz
Site Admin
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Posts: 956
|
| Post subject: |
|
|
| EdgarGrimfang wrote: | | Monochrome wrote: | | marine wrote: | | i like the idea of disguise my hat |
I'm actually pretty sure what Luzz didn't like about this idea the first few times. |
My only counter to that would be this...Does the knowledge of the headgear they're wearing make such a large bearing on how they are approached in combat? In time I'm sure players will come to sort a be able to guess what the "true" headgear a player is wearing... |
This is the reason why this was rejected in the past. By looking at an opponent, you should have some idea what they are equipped with, and how to battle them.
Yes, looks matter, but you can wear anything you like when you are not battling. When I am at home, I am in my underwear. When I am out to a meeting, I am in a shirt and slacks.
_________________
Support Reign Online by voting! |
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:03 am |
|
| Author |
Message |
GlitchyVirus
Joined: 20 Jun 2008
Posts: 637
|
| Post subject: |
|
|
| luzz wrote: | | EdgarGrimfang wrote: | | Monochrome wrote: | | marine wrote: | | i like the idea of disguise my hat |
I'm actually pretty sure what Luzz didn't like about this idea the first few times. |
My only counter to that would be this...Does the knowledge of the headgear they're wearing make such a large bearing on how they are approached in combat? In time I'm sure players will come to sort a be able to guess what the "true" headgear a player is wearing... |
This is the reason why this was rejected in the past. By looking at an opponent, you should have some idea what they are equipped with, and how to battle them.
Yes, looks matter, but you can wear anything you like when you are not battling. When I am at home, I am in my underwear. When I am out to a meeting, I am in a shirt and slacks.
|
At the same token, Luzz, you should be able to fight your opponents once and determine the equips they are using in the first place. That's what makes a player "good": being able to judge what equips they are using based on one or more fights, and act accordingly to change things in your favor.
If everything was out in the open, there would hardly be a point in playing because you'd know the perfect counter, and your opponent would know the perfect anti-counter, and you would know....etc.
Besides, what about converters? You can't see them. You can't see when someone is wearing Kiels or GTB before you fight them. You can't tell a stalker's build before they attack you. You can't tell what kind of weapon an opponent is using until you hit them once to reveal it.
I disagree with you. "By looking at an opponent, you should have some idea what they are equipped with, and how to battle them", AND BE INCORRECT. You should see that an LK is wearing wind wings and a Pure Valk Helm, you put on Wind Armor and a Thunder Pot, and use Holy Wings, only to see that you're getting hit for 30k BBs and doing 0~300 Damage because they used an Earth Converter and put on Angeling. And then you should be SMART ENOUGH to understand the causes of these instances, and change it up.
I believe: By looking at an opponent, you should have NO or LITTLE idea what they are equipped with, and how to battle them. You should FIGHT your opponent, determine for YOURSELF what they are wearing, and adjust your OWN equips/tactics to defeat your opponent. And you should look STYLISH when you do it! 
_________________
SUPRISE BUTTSEX. PREPARE!
Jasmine's drawing of me! <3
| Monochrome wrote: | | You brilliant, genius, limp-wristed sissy: I love you. |
|
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:27 pm |
|
| Author |
Message |
XDoggStrafe
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 188
Location: Snowy Canada
|
| Post subject: |
|
|
I'm voting yes, only because in the 2 years I've been on Reign, my hat has done literally NOTHING other than +10 to all stats, I know there are plenty of other headgears that give just +10 as well, and cost the same as my hat, and really, I'm not being forced to wear it. But I mean, I'd be happy with +8 to all stats and +3% mAtk on that thing... So yeah, voting on it, despite the fact that I'm pretty sure it's impossible to script this 100% working right away without a lot of hard work and time (since none of us have that script on hand, I think Luzz or someone else would have to script it themselves), and Luzz definitely has more important things to do than this.
_________________
The eXile is back once more... |
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:28 pm |
|
| Author |
Message |
GlitchyVirus
Joined: 20 Jun 2008
Posts: 637
|
| Post subject: |
|
|
I'd like to say that of 28 votes, 19 made a "Yes" vote and 9 made a "No" vote. Glad to see I'm not the only one who likes the idea @_@
I understand that it would probably be difficult to script and/or implement, and that it would certainly take time to do so. But I don't want this to be totally dismissed, because it really is a good idea.
Another idea I thought of is that (For each respective hat section ONLY) that you could pick the "hat style" for free for each donate, and then a "hat effect" for that specific donate.
So for example, first, when I go to trade in, I select what I want (let's say Angra, worth 15 GC). Then I choose that I hat I would like, but not for an amount, for "free" (let's say I choose Frog Prince Hat). THEN a new screen comes up saying "What do you want this hat to do?". And options would come up (that can ONLY apply to Upper Donates) such as "+10 Stats" for 10 GC, "+5 Stats, +10% Matk" for 10 GC, "+10 Stats, Unbreakable Weapon and Armor" for 15 GC, "+5 Stats, 10% chance to freeze" for 15 GC, etc. So I could choose the freeze for 15 GC.
Thus I would get a Frog Prince Hat that gives +5 Stats and can freeze at a 10% chance when attacked for 15GC. Which is normal.
Remember, it's not the HAT we pay more or less for. It's the EFFECT we want. So why not have the best of both worlds, if we can?
_________________
SUPRISE BUTTSEX. PREPARE!
Jasmine's drawing of me! <3
| Monochrome wrote: | | You brilliant, genius, limp-wristed sissy: I love you. |
|
|
| Sat Mar 12, 2011 4:54 pm |
|
| Author |
Message |
GlitchyVirus
Joined: 20 Jun 2008
Posts: 637
|
|
| Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:22 pm |
|
| Author |
Message |
Trashy Flowers
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Posts: 69
|
| Post subject: |
|
|
| I love this idea. I veto Luzz out of office |
|
| Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:50 am |
|
| Author |
Message |
jogradz1225
Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 308
Location: Knowing is half the Battle...
|
| Post subject: |
|
|
I vote no, cuz its too deceptive... Luzz is right, you wear clothes that fit occasions, wearing something Bright colored like RED is a funeral is just unapproptiate, also, the sprites and descriptions in the headgears are well thought of just for us to ruin it. you can change it anyway player's side, like changing the sprite of the stuff you're wearing to what sprite you want but not altering the item on other people's monitors, that way, you can view yourself as how you want to see yourself without extra effort.. I clearly see why Luzz didn't consider this...
_________________
  
http://dragcave.net/user/jogradz1225 |
|
| Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:19 pm |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
