Topic: Giggling box should ban in WOE...anyone agree? |
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Do you think that giggling box should be ban in woe? |
yes, i hate people using it >:( |
|
31% |
[ 15 ] |
yes (just think that it should be ban) |
|
12% |
[ 6 ] |
no, because i'm using it(it help me alot in WOE =D) |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
no, it is part of the game(don't think it should be ban) |
|
53% |
[ 25 ] |
|
Total Votes : 47 |
|
Author |
Message |
kinness
Joined: 26 Jun 2009 Posts: 83
|
Post subject: Giggling box should ban in WOE...anyone agree? |
|
|
anyone agree that?
giggling box:Restores 9% of Maximum HP, but has a 30% chance to get you Curse for 30 seconds. _________________ Alchemist >>> Biochemist >>> Genetic |
|
Sat Sep 26, 2009 1:31 am |
|
Author |
Message |
kinness
Joined: 26 Jun 2009 Posts: 83
|
Post subject: |
|
|
if u are using it in woe and u don't think it should be ban, please don't be shy vote for: no,because i'm using it
this point is stronger for disagree.
thanks guys! for giving feedback to my post _________________ Alchemist >>> Biochemist >>> Genetic |
|
Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:45 am |
|
Author |
Message |
Nyano
Joined: 11 May 2008 Posts: 58
|
Post subject: |
|
|
i vte yes, cuz u try to kill in woe, and u c guild using dat. it giv shame to class and make no use of creator and other classes. very guud poll.. _________________ o.o |
|
Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:00 am |
|
Author |
Message |
Zebruh
Joined: 10 Dec 2007 Posts: 1537 Location: Massachusetts
|
Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think it should be banned. It's just a very effective healing item. Not as effective as Yggdrasil items.
Which is why the Ygg's were banned, instead.
<__< _________________ ಡ u ಡ
Ręp time. |
|
Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:49 am |
|
Author |
Message |
joeodoy
Joined: 02 Feb 2009 Posts: 208
|
Post subject: |
|
|
I am the one vote, loud and proud _________________
IGN : Esse / Hammers / Sibyl / Vestalis Maxima / FullMoon |
|
Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:11 am |
|
Author |
Message |
Pimpgirl
Joined: 01 Feb 2009 Posts: 24
|
Post subject: |
|
|
I vote yes because I been noticed some LK with lot of vit and spamming the giggling box and rushing into the castle of more than 10 people guarding in it without dying. That situation actually getting crazy because LK without dying and they do magnum break to get off the traps which means woe is totally pointless ...those people just go in and break Emp with free pass.
I personally think it should be banned because people rely on the giggling box but forgot about we have high priest and biochemist class that can healing people. It actually make sniper, hp and bio class useless.
Let's assuming those people have lot of rare cards and spamming the giggling box with no cool down time. Don't say it is impossible for a person have lot of rare, at least i know some people have lot of rares and woe and spamming giggling boxes which ruin the fun.
That is my opinion
|
|
Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:43 am |
|
Author |
Message |
Kumori Uta
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 719 Location: Mordor
|
Post subject: |
|
|
Agreed - Which proves my point. _________________ One of the oldies.
hmu: kimaluto@outlook.com
|
|
Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:51 am |
|
Author |
Message |
SilverPriest
Joined: 14 Jul 2009 Posts: 223 Location: Please tell me where am I !
|
Post subject: |
|
|
I say No, cause its a part of the game and you still need the card that drops the giggling box before you earn alot. If the giggling box will be ban at WOE then you should change the effect of the Wraith Card _________________
Proud to be Low, Hate to be High! |
|
Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:55 pm |
|
Author |
Message |
Anam
Joined: 21 Jan 2009 Posts: 39 Location: USA
|
Post subject: |
|
|
There are other potions out there besides the giggling box, I guess it's just getting targeted because it's the most effective available for woe. Why someone could run around and use potions, that their creator made, condensed white potions heal for a lot, and blue potions for those who lose sp, I mean it's common sense and apart of a stratagy no matter how cheep anyone thinks it is, it woulnd't be a very fun woe if no one could heal up after they just took a castle to fight the next wave. Just my opinion.
I vote No, because it's apart of the game. (doesn't use giggling boxes)
Anam _________________ Anam-Champion
Did you know, its harder to frown than it is to smile? Lets all smile! |
|
Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:06 pm |
|
Author |
Message |
poringhunter
Joined: 28 Aug 2008 Posts: 101 Location: somewhere near you
|
Post subject: |
|
|
i managed to kill an LK using a sniper during woe some time before. and the fact that i never had any previous experience in using snipers proves that LKs using giggling boxes are basically just part of the game, much like asura fist for champs, and EDP for sinXs. |
|
Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:30 pm |
|
Author |
Message |
klever
Joined: 26 May 2009 Posts: 22
|
Post subject: |
|
|
i voted it should be banned because, for one, it's meaningless killing something (or someone) which cannot die.
if berries and seed are banned because they heal a percentage of hp, why isn't giggling box banned? (well, 5 gigglings add up to nearly a seed)
well, if banning them seems a lil too serious, i have some suggestions:
1. giggling box's drop rate should be returned back to 1% drop(instead of 20%) which is the normal drop rate in officials and also why they are not banned in war.
2. add some "cast delay" for giggling boxes.
3. you can't use giggling(s) 5 seconds after you're hit (like you can't log out after being hit) which means u still can use it after taking a castle or after a fierce battle. |
|
Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:51 pm |
|
Author |
Message |
Toft
Joined: 23 Apr 2008 Posts: 466 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
|
Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with klever, though people spamming Giggling Boxes are killable, it's anoying.
I voted for it to get banned. |
|
Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:29 pm |
|
Author |
Message |
Kumori Uta
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 719 Location: Mordor
|
Post subject: |
|
|
klever wrote: | i voted it should be banned because, for one, it's meaningless killing something (or someone) which cannot die.
if berries and seed are banned because they heal a percentage of hp, why isn't giggling box banned? (well, 5 gigglings add up to nearly a seed)
well, if banning them seems a lil too serious, i have some suggestions:
1. giggling box's drop rate should be returned back to 1% drop(instead of 20%) which is the normal drop rate in officials and also why they are not banned in war.
2. add some "cast delay" for giggling boxes.
3. you can't use giggling(s) 5 seconds after you're hit (like you can't log out after being hit) which means u still can use it after taking a castle or after a fierce battle. |
Agreeeeeeeeeed. :] I use my creator for WOE for healing mostly. It would be a shame to have to switch char, plus, it is a part of the game, but unlike some people that woe, some people do have a problem with it being usable. If they took yggs, and seeds: Why would it be a problem taking it away? ~.~ It's the same effect (kinda) like he said, 5 giggling = 1 ygg. Personally, I do get a little offended. D: < (jk) It's like- If you have an army, and only 1 person comes witt giggling, they take emp easily cuz they move. They do not take ANY damages from what is supposed to do cause they spam and take full health. I voted yes, it should and proud of it xD _________________ One of the oldies.
hmu: kimaluto@outlook.com
|
|
Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:14 pm |
|
Author |
Message |
Zebruh
Joined: 10 Dec 2007 Posts: 1537 Location: Massachusetts
|
Post subject: |
|
|
They don't call you "Klever" for nothin'. I vote for his/her idea, over banning them completely.
Adding some of those would make it less annoying for other people.
Words words words words.
If that one guy takes a castle guarded by ten people, those ten people shouldn't have a problem taking it back before he kills them all, right?
SP replenishing items should go, too.
I've seen an previous member(Champion class) drop a group of 7 using only 3 skills. Though, he did use the skills each at least 7 times. One skill was used 14 times. _________________ ಡ u ಡ
Ręp time. |
|
Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:26 pm |
|
Author |
Message |
Kumori Uta
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 719 Location: Mordor
|
Post subject: |
|
|
Zebruh wrote: | They don't call you "Klever" for nothin'. I vote for his/her idea, over banning them completely.
Adding some of those would make it less annoying for other people.
Words words words words.
If that one guy takes a castle guarded by ten people, those ten people shouldn't have a problem taking it back before he kills them all, right?
SP replenishing items should go, too.
I've seen an previous member(Champion class) drop a group of 7 using only 3 skills. Though, he did use the skills each at least 7 times. One skill was used 14 times. |
- - It should be banned, also sp items. I see champs fighting in a woe castle, asura like 6-7 people wit at least a bit of sp !! _________________ One of the oldies.
hmu: kimaluto@outlook.com
|
|
Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:33 am |
|
|