Information     Downloads     Game Account      Forum Account       Reviews

Thanks to: Gravity | eAthena Project Vote for Silver Coins: Site 1 | Site 2 | Site 3 | Site 4 | Site 5 | Site 6 | Site 7 | Site 8
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Reign Online Forum Index -> Suggestion Box
  Topic: Giggling box should ban in WOE...anyone agree?
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Do you think that giggling box should be ban in woe?
yes, i hate people using it >:(
31%
 31%  [ 15 ]
yes (just think that it should be ban)
12%
 12%  [ 6 ]
no, because i'm using it(it help me alot in WOE =D)
2%
 2%  [ 1 ]
no, it is part of the game(don't think it should be ban)
53%
 53%  [ 25 ]
Total Votes : 47

Author Message
kinness



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 83

Post  Post subject: Giggling box should ban in WOE...anyone agree? Reply with quote

anyone agree that? Wink

giggling box:Restores 9% of Maximum HP, but has a 30% chance to get you Curse for 30 seconds.
_________________
Alchemist >>> Biochemist >>> Genetic
Sat Sep 26, 2009 1:31 am
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
kinness



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 83

Post  Post subject: Reply with quote

if u are using it in woe and u don't think it should be ban, please don't be shy vote for: no,because i'm using it

this point is stronger for disagree. Wink


thanks guys! for giving feedback to my post Very Happy
_________________
Alchemist >>> Biochemist >>> Genetic
Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:45 am
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
Nyano



Joined: 11 May 2008
Posts: 58

Post  Post subject: Reply with quote

i vte yes, cuz u try to kill in woe, and u c guild using dat. it giv shame to class and make no use of creator and other classes. very guud poll..
_________________
o.o
Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:00 am
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
Author Message
Zebruh



Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 1537
Location: Massachusetts

Post  Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think it should be banned. It's just a very effective healing item. Not as effective as Yggdrasil items.
Which is why the Ygg's were banned, instead.
<__<
_________________
u
Ręp time.
Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:49 am
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Author Message
joeodoy



Joined: 02 Feb 2009
Posts: 208

Post  Post subject: Reply with quote

I am the one vote, loud and proud Very Happy
_________________


IGN : Esse / Hammers / Sibyl / Vestalis Maxima / FullMoon
Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:11 am
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
Pimpgirl



Joined: 01 Feb 2009
Posts: 24

Post  Post subject: Reply with quote

I vote yes because I been noticed some LK with lot of vit and spamming the giggling box and rushing into the castle of more than 10 people guarding in it without dying. That situation actually getting crazy because LK without dying and they do magnum break to get off the traps which means woe is totally pointless ...those people just go in and break Emp with free pass.

I personally think it should be banned because people rely on the giggling box but forgot about we have high priest and biochemist class that can healing people. It actually make sniper, hp and bio class useless.

Let's assuming those people have lot of rare cards and spamming the giggling box with no cool down time. Don't say it is impossible for a person have lot of rare, at least i know some people have lot of rares and woe and spamming giggling boxes which ruin the fun.

That is my opinion
Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:43 am
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
Kumori Uta



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 719
Location: Mordor

Post  Post subject: Reply with quote

Agreed - Which proves my point.
_________________
One of the oldies.
hmu: kimaluto@outlook.com
Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:51 am
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Author Message
SilverPriest



Joined: 14 Jul 2009
Posts: 223
Location: Please tell me where am I !

Post  Post subject: Reply with quote

I say No, cause its a part of the game and you still need the card that drops the giggling box before you earn alot. If the giggling box will be ban at WOE then you should change the effect of the Wraith Card
_________________


Proud to be Low, Hate to be High!
Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:55 pm
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Author Message
Anam



Joined: 21 Jan 2009
Posts: 39
Location: USA

Post  Post subject: Reply with quote

There are other potions out there besides the giggling box, I guess it's just getting targeted because it's the most effective available for woe. Why someone could run around and use potions, that their creator made, condensed white potions heal for a lot, and blue potions for those who lose sp, I mean it's common sense and apart of a stratagy no matter how cheep anyone thinks it is, it woulnd't be a very fun woe if no one could heal up after they just took a castle to fight the next wave. Just my opinion.

I vote No, because it's apart of the game. (doesn't use giggling boxes)

Anam

_________________
Anam-Champion
Did you know, its harder to frown than it is to smile? Lets all smile!
Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:06 pm
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
poringhunter



Joined: 28 Aug 2008
Posts: 101
Location: somewhere near you

Post  Post subject: Reply with quote

i managed to kill an LK using a sniper during woe some time before. and the fact that i never had any previous experience in using snipers proves that LKs using giggling boxes are basically just part of the game, much like asura fist for champs, and EDP for sinXs.
Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:30 pm
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
klever



Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 22

Post  Post subject: Reply with quote

i voted it should be banned because, for one, it's meaningless killing something (or someone) which cannot die.

if berries and seed are banned because they heal a percentage of hp, why isn't giggling box banned? (well, 5 gigglings add up to nearly a seed)

well, if banning them seems a lil too serious, i have some suggestions:

1. giggling box's drop rate should be returned back to 1% drop(instead of 20%) which is the normal drop rate in officials and also why they are not banned in war.

2. add some "cast delay" for giggling boxes.

3. you can't use giggling(s) 5 seconds after you're hit (like you can't log out after being hit) which means u still can use it after taking a castle or after a fierce battle.
Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:51 pm
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
Toft



Joined: 23 Apr 2008
Posts: 466
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.

Post  Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with klever, though people spamming Giggling Boxes are killable, it's anoying.

I voted for it to get banned.
Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:29 pm
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Author Message
Kumori Uta



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 719
Location: Mordor

Post  Post subject: Reply with quote

klever wrote:
i voted it should be banned because, for one, it's meaningless killing something (or someone) which cannot die.

if berries and seed are banned because they heal a percentage of hp, why isn't giggling box banned? (well, 5 gigglings add up to nearly a seed)

well, if banning them seems a lil too serious, i have some suggestions:

1. giggling box's drop rate should be returned back to 1% drop(instead of 20%) which is the normal drop rate in officials and also why they are not banned in war.

2. add some "cast delay" for giggling boxes.

3. you can't use giggling(s) 5 seconds after you're hit (like you can't log out after being hit) which means u still can use it after taking a castle or after a fierce battle.


Agreeeeeeeeeed. :] I use my creator for WOE for healing mostly. It would be a shame to have to switch char, plus, it is a part of the game, but unlike some people that woe, some people do have a problem with it being usable. If they took yggs, and seeds: Why would it be a problem taking it away? ~.~ It's the same effect (kinda) like he said, 5 giggling = 1 ygg. Personally, I do get a little offended. D: < (jk) It's like- If you have an army, and only 1 person comes witt giggling, they take emp easily cuz they move. They do not take ANY damages from what is supposed to do cause they spam and take full health. I voted yes, it should and proud of it xD
_________________
One of the oldies.
hmu: kimaluto@outlook.com
Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:14 pm
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Author Message
Zebruh



Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 1537
Location: Massachusetts

Post  Post subject: Reply with quote

They don't call you "Klever" for nothin'. I vote for his/her idea, over banning them completely.

Adding some of those would make it less annoying for other people.

Words words words words.

If that one guy takes a castle guarded by ten people, those ten people shouldn't have a problem taking it back before he kills them all, right?

SP replenishing items should go, too.
I've seen an previous member(Champion class) drop a group of 7 using only 3 skills. Though, he did use the skills each at least 7 times. One skill was used 14 times.
_________________
u
Ręp time.
Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:26 pm
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Author Message
Kumori Uta



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 719
Location: Mordor

Post  Post subject: Reply with quote

Zebruh wrote:
They don't call you "Klever" for nothin'. I vote for his/her idea, over banning them completely.

Adding some of those would make it less annoying for other people.

Words words words words.

If that one guy takes a castle guarded by ten people, those ten people shouldn't have a problem taking it back before he kills them all, right?

SP replenishing items should go, too.
I've seen an previous member(Champion class) drop a group of 7 using only 3 skills. Though, he did use the skills each at least 7 times. One skill was used 14 times.


- - It should be banned, also sp items. I see champs fighting in a woe castle, asura like 6-7 people wit at least a bit of sp !!
_________________
One of the oldies.
hmu: kimaluto@outlook.com
Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:33 am
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Reign Online Forum Index -> Suggestion Box All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum