[shaiderr]

i noticed that WOE here in reign is sometime quite boring, cause most of the castles are defended just by guardians or walls that you have to break, if there will be a defender player, he will be just one with boss cards lol,because there are lots of castles most guid are just waiting for the last minute to break into one, some castles are not even defended, what im suggesting is to minimize the number or agits or castles so that when it is WOE time it is really WAR,about the essence probably you can just edit it so guilds will be forced to used strategy, not brute forced and MVP cards,if the number of castles will be lessened WOE will be much more fun and the WAR in War of EMperium is really a WAR!!!, for example is the castles will be PRONTERA, PAYON,GEFFEN,ALDE etc. just some few and just edit the essence to those castles from the ones that will be wiped out, just a friendly suggestion since most of my clanmates noticed this every WOE ^^

[Zebruh]

Not to shoot down your idea, I do like it, but...
There will always be a power great enough to blast through even the greatest tactics.

Atleast here on Ragnarok.
_________________
ಡ u ಡ
Ræp time.

[shaiderr]

im not really in to that power stuff, all i say is its more enjoyable if the WAR is really a WAR ^^,, its just the thing called having fun while playing, its ok if someone is really stronger, but still you'll try to overcome that no matter what ^^ , thanks for the reply

[Zebruh]

You can't make people more energetic.
_________________
ಡ u ಡ
Ræp time.

[luzz]

We have considered this a few times in the past. Our conclusion was that it is more beneficial to have all the castles open because then smaller / weaker guilds can end up with some castles too. The popular castles (Prontera, aesprika essence castles, etc) will always see a lot of action, so if one desires a more challenging WoE, they can try for those castles.

If castles are limited, then the stronger guilds will usually end up with all the castles, and, depending on the rotation, might have to hold on to them longer than they wish too.
_________________
Support Reign Online by voting!

[shaiderr]

thats the whole point, if a strong guilds holds on that castle, other guild will be challenge to put on some strenght within their guilds, strategys will come to play,the thing is we dont care about who is strong, cause everybody loves a challenge, if a guild is really strong, so be it, but there will always be a time that others will be also, its really nice to see a WAR in WOE , not just a bunch of players defending the said castles, then do a last minute breaks on the other give away castles, anyways, its just a suggestion ^^, thanks for the reply, i do appreciate those comments

[Zebruh]

The last minute break-throughs are a lot more exciting than people fighting for 120 minutes, in my opinion.

And you just want it to last longer... But the key fact you're over looking is that... waiting until the timer is almost up is, in fact, a strategy.
Past experience proves it to be an efficient one.

It really sounds like you just don't like Sinx's who bust in on 30seconds and take your castle. :X
_________________
ಡ u ಡ
Ræp time.

[shaiderr]

youre not getting my point lol , Am a sinx and i can break an emp so quick, i know how it feels lol, the thing is most of the last minute guys are those unknown guilds lolz, there will be always someone stronger, so thats the challenge ,am talking bout a whole guild strategy no individual lol

[luzz]

shaiderr, I understand your point. This topic has often been debated. We felt the current WoE allows most people to be happy.

However, we will consider this again.
_________________
Support Reign Online by voting!

[threekings]

I disagree Shaiderr. Sorry friend but I feel that the guild wars just depend on the number of players and sizes of guilds. Even these "brute force" players should fall to a well skilled 4/5 man army w / donates alone. Remember that one of the things which make RO what it is is how when certain classes clash, it factors out to a kind of rock/paper/sissor battle.
_________________

• Vision ( paladin ) Max
  
• Shriek ( stalker ) Max
  
  

[Chocolat]

The players that are "brute force" actually know what they're doing, have the gear to do the job that needs to be done, and can easily break through a 4-5 man army. Even if they're just slipping by (SinX, Stalker), I've found it extremely easy to break the emperium in under 5 seconds -- (and that's with the shoddy gear I have for breaking; "brute force" will (SinX)EDP, Cursed Water, TDG/DD-AG Katar (Stalker)TDG/DD-AG bow, Cursed water, ori arrows) -- I'm not even getting into the LK that have the gear for the job. I mean, Endure, plow, Berserk, take out the emp. It's seriously easy. Though, I'm just speaking from personal experience.
_________________


Lucielle // Failed Stalker <3
Giselle Rose // Retired Whitesmith BoC

Starting over.

[shaiderr]

guys.. all am saying here is Bring the War in WOE lol, 5 poeple is not an army lol, its just like pvp, i think it can only happen it there are limitted castles lol, Guilds will be forced to unite recruit players who WOE strategies. so and so fort , thanks for the reply guys , i end this topic. no more reply plss. thanks to all of you GLHF

[Chocolat]

You have clearly not seen a 5-man army in a heated WoE.

Back when I was in Forsaken, it was us, whatever the hell Dreams was named previously, and one other guild of whose name always escapes me.

5 v 5 v 5 = PAIN.

Sometimes it got worse if it was a drama-filled day. I mean, 30 people in the Emp room gets to be pretty hectic. But that's me digressing.
_________________


Lucielle // Failed Stalker <3
Giselle Rose // Retired Whitesmith BoC

Starting over.

[Toft]

Should've tried iRO then.

[Zebruh]