Topic: Leveling the playing field for all classes |
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Should we impliment this? |
Yes |
|
16% |
[ 2 ] |
No |
|
83% |
[ 10 ] |
|
Total Votes : 12 |
|
Author |
Message |
marine
Joined: 22 Jun 2009 Posts: 1389 Location: here
|
Post subject: |
|
|
Glenfiddich wrote: | No, it is a great suggestion. I think it would make everyone happier. |
so far i only see 3 magic users beeing agrein with this and goin against gtb , there are lot more wizards and scholars and ninja tht just acept the things as their are because gravity is workin on a brand new balance tht will arrive among thte 3 jobs .. uuh im repeating myself all oer the place i feel ignored ..
acept things as they are , is a unfair world dealt with it.
Ro imitates world in a big part so is gona be unfair for some , dealt with it .
quotin old man : i empathize u but i wont simpathise with you . _________________
|
|
Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:20 am |
|
Author |
Message |
Glenfiddich
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 1735 Location: Australia, Brisbane
|
Post subject: |
|
|
If it was coming in the new patch, iRO Valkyrie probably would not have removed it. _________________ Characters-
Glenfiddich; 255- Professor
Jager Bomb; 255- Creator
Rammstein; 255- Creator |
|
Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:28 am |
|
Author |
Message |
marine
Joined: 22 Jun 2009 Posts: 1389 Location: here
|
Post subject: |
|
|
go back to iro ?
compare private servers with oficials is a mistake tht even myself done . think about it.
and edit : check gravity press conference if u want to know about the new balance or just go to irowiki the oracle let u know everything tht is been cchanged.
quotin old man : i empathize you but i wont simpathise with you . _________________
Last edited by marine on Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:32 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:30 am |
|
Author |
Message |
Seraphiel
Joined: 12 Oct 2009 Posts: 78 Location: Virginia
|
Post subject: |
|
|
marine wrote: | go back to iro ?
compare private servers with oficials is a mistake tht even myself done . think about it. |
This pretty much sums it up. If you want it to be like iRO, play iRO. |
|
Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:31 am |
|
Author |
Message |
marine
Joined: 22 Jun 2009 Posts: 1389 Location: here
|
Post subject: |
|
|
Seraphiel wrote: | marine wrote: | go back to iro ?
compare private servers with oficials is a mistake tht even myself done . think about it. |
This pretty much sums it up. If you want it to be like iRO, play iRO. |
and when u are on iro tell em about make a card tht nullifies melee , or if gtb isnt there , but warm of hermonde and invul sigfriend songs are tht is sure still is there , tell em to make a new song tht block all melee ,and psik attk income in the aoe of the song . _________________
|
|
Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:33 am |
|
Author |
Message |
Seraphiel
Joined: 12 Oct 2009 Posts: 78 Location: Virginia
|
Post subject: |
|
|
marine wrote: | Seraphiel wrote: | marine wrote: | go back to iro ?
compare private servers with oficials is a mistake tht even myself done . think about it. |
This pretty much sums it up. If you want it to be like iRO, play iRO. |
and when u are on iro tell em about make a card tht nullifies melee , or if gtb isnt there , but warm of hermonde and invul sigfriend songs are tht is sure still is there , tell em to make a new song tht block all melee ,and psik attk income in the aoe of the song . |
LOL |
|
Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:40 am |
|
Author |
Message |
Glenfiddich
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 1735 Location: Australia, Brisbane
|
Post subject: |
|
|
I am over low rates.
And no you dont ask official servers for that sort of thing. Thats what private servers are for.
And no i dont want a melee equivalent. You obviously havent detected my sarcasm, or me being an idiot to make a point.
That would ruin the game as i stated in my very first post.
This game is to be compared to iRO or official servers, as official servers were there first and thats where private servers come from so to speak. The gm's have even themselves referred to official servers in comparison.
Are you going to tell them not to as well? _________________ Characters-
Glenfiddich; 255- Professor
Jager Bomb; 255- Creator
Rammstein; 255- Creator |
|
Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:43 am |
|
Author |
Message |
Seraphiel
Joined: 12 Oct 2009 Posts: 78 Location: Virginia
|
Post subject: |
|
|
Glenfiddich wrote: | I am over low rates.
And no you dont ask official servers for that sort of thing. Thats what private servers are for.
And no i dont want a melee equivalent. You obviously havent detected my sarcasm, or me being an idiot to make a point.
That would ruin the game as i stated in my very first post.
This game is to be compared to iRO or official servers, as official servers were there first and thats where private servers come from so to speak. The gm's have even themselves referred to official servers in comparison.
Are you going to tell them not to as well? |
Yes, the official servers came first. Yes, some things can be compared to them. But not everything.
Private servers can have drastically different mechanics. Think of attack speed. You can look directly at the safety wall thread. It needs to be changed, to stray away from how it was made to be in iRO to fit the needs of the different mechanics in play. I know this isn't exactly what we were talking about but my point is that not everything should be compared to iRO. Nothing is absolute. |
|
Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:51 am |
|
Author |
Message |
marine
Joined: 22 Jun 2009 Posts: 1389 Location: here
|
Post subject: |
|
|
Glenfiddich wrote: | I am over low rates.
And no you dont ask official servers for that sort of thing. Thats what private servers are for.
And no i dont want a melee equivalent. You obviously havent detected my sarcasm, or me being an idiot to make a point.
That would ruin the game as i stated in my very first post.
This game is to be compared to iRO or official servers, as official servers were there first and thats where private servers come from so to speak. The gm's have even themselves referred to official servers in comparison.
Are you going to tell them not to as well? |
I am over low rates.
And no you dont ask official servers for that sort of thing. Thats what private servers are for.
if privates are meant to be diferent than iro , how come u guys want to follow their steps with gtb .
ok dont tell em about the card , tell em about make a emblense song tht totally nullify melee , psi attk skills dmg while inside the aoe . _________________
|
|
Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:52 am |
|
Author |
Message |
Glenfiddich
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 1735 Location: Australia, Brisbane
|
Post subject: |
|
|
I am not comparing everything to iRO, but alot does need to be compared to it.
I just think the 75% change is just hindering magic class as much as the current state of the card.
They are already useless pretty much without the card even there. Sorry if i am jumping between threads. Dont know which one i am in anymore haha. _________________ Characters-
Glenfiddich; 255- Professor
Jager Bomb; 255- Creator
Rammstein; 255- Creator |
|
Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:54 am |
|
Author |
Message |
marine
Joined: 22 Jun 2009 Posts: 1389 Location: here
|
Post subject: |
|
|
Glenfiddich wrote: | I am not comparing everything to iRO, but alot does need to be compared to it.
I just think the 75% change is just hindering magic class as much as the current state of the card.
They are already useless pretty much without the card even there. Sorry if i am jumping between threads. Dont know which one i am in anymore haha. |
if this will still make em useless , then leave gtb just as it was there are only a few pple tht have tht card hence cus is very hard to obtain .
Smart player know how to counter magic without a gtb , i would love gtb for the sole purpose is the only card tht blocks coma. _________________
|
|
Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:00 am |
|
Author |
Message |
Seraphiel
Joined: 12 Oct 2009 Posts: 78 Location: Virginia
|
Post subject: |
|
|
Glenfiddich wrote: | I am not comparing everything to iRO, but alot does need to be compared to it.
I just think the 75% change is just hindering magic class as much as the current state of the card.
They are already useless pretty much without the card even there. Sorry if i am jumping between threads. Dont know which one i am in anymore haha. |
I'm getting that too. xDD (6 am and no sleep, it's killing me xD)
I said before that it's a large combination of things compiling against magic users, and the solution does not lie in removing GTB. It's one of the smaller elements that compound to the problem. I think it's time we look for ways of helping to even things out that have nothing to do with GTB. |
|
Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:01 am |
|
Author |
Message |
Glenfiddich
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 1735 Location: Australia, Brisbane
|
Post subject: |
|
|
More MATK somehow? :O _________________ Characters-
Glenfiddich; 255- Professor
Jager Bomb; 255- Creator
Rammstein; 255- Creator |
|
Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:03 am |
|
Author |
Message |
marine
Joined: 22 Jun 2009 Posts: 1389 Location: here
|
Post subject: |
|
|
Seraphiel wrote: | Glenfiddich wrote: | I am not comparing everything to iRO, but alot does need to be compared to it.
I just think the 75% change is just hindering magic class as much as the current state of the card.
They are already useless pretty much without the card even there. Sorry if i am jumping between threads. Dont know which one i am in anymore haha. |
I'm getting that too. xDD (6 am and no sleep, it's killing me xD)
I said before that it's a large combination of things compiling against magic users, and the solution does not lie in removing GTB. It's one of the smaller elements that compound to the problem. I think it's time we look for ways of helping to even things out that have nothing to do with GTB. |
you are right , you know wht happens 3 magic users started complainin because a few pple worked their arses to totally nullify magic , while other pple can still be getin almost no dmg from the 4 wiz scholar ninjas elements with not workin their arse out , let say it would take u a few days realise to get good reductions , while it would even take u a year of hard work to get a gtb card . _________________
|
|
Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:04 am |
|
Author |
Message |
Seraphiel
Joined: 12 Oct 2009 Posts: 78 Location: Virginia
|
Post subject: |
|
|
Glenfiddich wrote: | More MATK somehow? :O |
I think a reduction in reductions would make more sense. |
|
Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:05 am |
|
|