Topic: WoE 2 castles |
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tehdarke
Joined: 25 Jun 2010 Posts: 593
|
Post subject: |
|
|
which means mission accomplished 8D! _________________
Super Beaner (Ex. BoC sniper/NBH)
Copy Cat (Nub)
Reneab (BoC Star Glad/NBH~)
Captain Bean (DoA)
Gerg De Bean (Degeneration X)
Alovein (Degeneration X)
Sir Beansalot (Degeneration X Leader)
NBH Fo-Life Motha FAKU~ |
|
Thu May 19, 2011 10:28 pm |
|
Author |
Message |
bah
Joined: 11 May 2011 Posts: 6
|
Post subject: |
|
|
tehdarke wrote: | o.o ok I woe. If your problem is compotition or its too boring..... to all those who say this: y not go atk a castle and make compotition? o.o easy fix? |
Trust me I would love to attack during woe but ey im not guild leader so I dont decide who,when, and where to attack or defend |
|
Thu May 19, 2011 11:44 pm |
|
Author |
Message |
bah
Joined: 11 May 2011 Posts: 6
|
Post subject: |
|
|
jogradz1225 wrote: | bah wrote: | I find it retarded how you say that only few guilds will have the chance of getting a castle. Either they get it because they know how to play during woe and they diserve it or there is just a low population in server which means there should just be opened a low amount of castles. Also someone said that guilds defend with more than 2 ppl so if they have a good amount of ppl to defend they MUST also have a good amount of ppl to attack.
I dont know how you say I only do mondays woe; I have a life and I care way lot more about my sleep than a retarded woe at like 4 AM with no competition.
This suggestion was made for creating a good woe competition and start making guilds working as a team gvging etc. But if you guys say that no well its you who either are scared of fighting or dont want server's WoE to grow up.
|
no, our woe is not retarded... see this is what happens when someone gets greedy for castles... by reducing the number of castles open at a time, you're suggesting that only one or two guilds hold all castles at a time... know what i mean? if a guild that can defend really well and attack really well gets a hold of castles... how will other guilds measure up? by reducing the number of castles open you're making the woe retarded, its not healthy competition because we do not have two guilds only... there are lots of guilds in our server and if they all compete for one or two castles, how many do you think will make it in pre emp if at the entrance they will kill each other already? wont it be more beneficial for the castle holder if enemies fight amongst themselves? while they are intact and ready to kill anyone that would be lucky to enter the emp room... that's why Luzz made woe to open 10 castles per woe to accommodate diversity...
look at it at a bigger picture, you're missing out ^_^
Edit:
some people refuse to expand their guild by pirating other guild's guild members... and some do not wish to join other guilds because they are friends with the Guild Leader of their guild, if you did not see this, you're just power hungry and not concerned about how to enhance woe... cuz what you will do is when a guild owns the castle for a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooonnnnnnnngggggggggggggg time... you'll join that guild and leave your guild that can't break emps... no loyalty... just power hungry ^_^ |
I wasent gonna keep posting but after I read this I LOLED so I feel like destroying your post (:
You say that if a guild thats knows how to defend and attack well gets a castle they will keep it. Dont you think that if they know how to do both things they diserve the castle?
Now you will say its unfair for the other guilds because they wont get a castle and they wont grow up because they dont know how to attack. Read guides and learn to play its not that hard. If you know your role you are good. Also if they arent that good DO YOU THINK THEY DISERVE A CASTLE?
You say we dont only have 2 guilds and therefore there should'nt be only 2 castles opened. If we ONLY HAD 2 GUILDS we would have 2 castles opened? RETARDED IDEA that would mean they would both defend ALL WOE since its only 2 guilds so both guilds defend and no one attacks em.
I could continue going but well I think thats enough.
As someone said you dont know anything about War of Emperium. If you dont know what you are talking about please dont post. I wont say no offense;take it however you want. |
|
Thu May 19, 2011 11:55 pm |
|
Author |
Message |
GRANDPA DREADNAUGHT
Joined: 30 Mar 2010 Posts: 641
|
Post subject: |
|
|
This isnt about who does and does not deserve castles is it? I mean really? You pretty much just admitted you dont want people getting castles even if all they have is about 4 people to work with, I suggest you stop right about now.
WoE is supposed to be about getting on with your guildies, having some fun and doing whatever you guys constitute as fun.
Whether that's EMP crashing for numbers sake, (Reneshin I'm looking at you Mr 300+ Emp Breaks and 400+ Guild breaks XD) or holding with defenses from 5 people fending off 10, or attacking people with 5 players while the defenders have over 9000 players.
We have many ways to partake in, and have fun in WoE, why are you trying to take that away from people?
Why do people have to adhere to YOUR style of fun in WoE instead of their own style of fun? Changing the system so that way "Only one type of fun" is allowed, is dumb and will make more people quit WoE than participate in it I feel, which is the exact opposite of what you are trying to do. (According to the original post that is)
In tandem, why dont you go ahead and tell us what guild you are from, what your real forum account is, and why we should bother listening to you if you wont provide either? All things aside, guys, were getting trolled dumb good here, stop feeding him, last post from me in this threads.
EdgarGrimfang wrote: |
Because that good sir, would make sense, and thus defuse the entire argument. |
_________________
EdgarGrimfang wrote: |
Because that good sir, would make sense, and thus defuse the entire argument. |
EdgarGrimfang wrote: | Remember kids, Cigarettes are alot like hamsters. Utterly harmless to have until placed into your mouth, and lit on fire.
Don't smoke hamsters kids. |
|
|
Fri May 20, 2011 12:10 am |
|
Author |
Message |
bah
Joined: 11 May 2011 Posts: 6
|
Post subject: |
|
|
GRANDPA DREADNAUGHT wrote: | This isnt about who does and does not deserve castles is it? I mean really? You pretty much just admitted you dont want people getting castles even if all they have is about 4 people to work with, I suggest you stop right about now.
WoE is supposed to be about getting on with your guildies, having some fun and doing whatever you guys constitute as fun.
Whether that's EMP crashing for numbers sake, (Reneshin I'm looking at you Mr 300+ Emp Breaks and 400+ Guild breaks XD) or holding with defenses from 5 people fending off 10, or attacking people with 5 players while the defenders have over 9000 players.
We have many ways to partake in, and have fun in WoE, why are you trying to take that away from people?
Why do people have to adhere to YOUR style of fun in WoE instead of their own style of fun? Changing the system so that way "Only one type of fun" is allowed, is dumb and will make more people quit WoE than participate in it I feel, which is the exact opposite of what you are trying to do. (According to the original post that is)
In tandem, why dont you go ahead and tell us what guild you are from, what your real forum account is, and why we should bother listening to you if you wont provide either? All things aside, guys, were getting trolled dumb good here, stop feeding him, last post from me in this threads.
EdgarGrimfang wrote: |
Because that good sir, would make sense, and thus defuse the entire argument. |
|
You are bad...
And I mean it(This time is an offense)
Im trying to make WOE COMPETITION GROW. YOU DONT KNOW WUT THAT IS BECAUSE YOU PROBABLY DONT KNOW HOW WOE WORKS OR BECAUSE YOU HAVE A 10- IQ.
WoE is to get fun I dunno wut kindda fun you get from attacking alone castles. You like PvP? I bet you do Person vs Person.
WoE is full of GvG's Guild vs Guild, teamwork, organization.
YOU ARE STUPID IM BAH PROFF THIS IS MY ONLY AND REAL FORUM ACCOUNT AND IM FROM SOS. ANY PROBLEM WITH ME BEIGN FROM SOS?
YOU MAD GO POST ABOUT IT.
PLEASE KEEP POSTING. DINT STOP CAUSE YOU RAN OUT OF STUPID ARGUMENTS. |
|
Fri May 20, 2011 12:39 am |
|
Author |
Message |
luzz Site Admin
Joined: 14 Oct 2007 Posts: 956
|
Post subject: Re: WoE 2 castles |
|
|
Topic Locked.
If you want to encourage people to see things from your view, it helps to not insult them.
Please read the Diplomacy Mini-Guide.
http://www.reignonline.net/viewtopic.php?t=145 _________________ Support Reign Online by voting! |
|
Fri May 20, 2011 1:02 am |
|
Author |
Message |
luzz Site Admin
Joined: 14 Oct 2007 Posts: 956
|
Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, we will have a revamped WoE in a few weeks.
We have taken almost all the feedback we have received the past few months and tried to incorporate as much as we can into the new system.
Stay tuned.
_________________ Support Reign Online by voting! |
|
Fri May 20, 2011 1:13 am |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|