 Topic: Bloody Branches Suggestion (Beezlebub along with others) |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Bloody Branch Changes |
| Yes new BB script |
|
28% |
[ 15 ] |
| No leave it as is |
|
42% |
[ 22 ] |
| Yes new BB script & lower the price of BBs |
|
21% |
[ 11 ] |
| No leave it as is, Just lower the price of BBs |
|
7% |
[ 4 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 52 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Leilani
Joined: 07 Mar 2010
Posts: 264
|
 Post subject: |
 |
|
| littleboyjuggernaught wrote: | I know this is old..but I just had to comment:
| GRANDPA DREADNAUGHT wrote: | I am just 100% unsure how a unactive player who does not play the game anymore, according to their own words, has any say on what should happen ingame, considering it wont effect them at all. That is all and I just wish for some clarification.
Agree'd everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and I am not denying anyone that, but if why should that opinion matter if it will not effect that person in any way shape or form?
Its also what we call "Having a standing" in the legal system.
Like when Alabama tried to sue BP even though Alabama is not effected by the ocean disaster, save maybe a few hotels losing traveling tourists.
The judge ruled they did not have standing, therefore they could not sue BP.
This same "Standing" law is being used against people who want gays to not be able to marry. They dont have anything to gain or lose from it, so why should it matter to them? This is just how the legal system works and I am taking a example from there.
I might not be online a whole lot because everyone has lives IRL, but I still play the game enough to where something like this would effect me. |
Firstly, unactive is not a word. You mean inactive.
Next, it is clear that sourlime does, in fact, have a standing (yes, in law terms) due to the fact that he/she was and still is part of this community. He/She has enough connection to this particular case that his/her input should be heard as he/she understands how this community is run. In addition, his/her opinion on the situation is one that is very well thought out, unlike your post here.
In fact, we could consider sourlime a "learned intermediary" since though he/she has no direct causation or effect on this situation, he/she knows quite enough to present her own opinion.
If you are a law major, then you will understand this: Ignorantia juris non excusat. That is in reference to you and your (improper) usage and case citations. You obviously don't understand the "proximate cause" concept.
| GRANDPA DREADNAUGHT wrote: | I am not attacking you or your opinion, but I do not see why "your opinion" should be counted as per the poll above, when the final decision of this poll will not effect you in any way shape or form, because you yourself stated you no longer play this game.
You can have your opinions and share them all you desire and wish, I never said you could not, you can post all you wish, but if you do not play the game anymore (Like you said you dont) then your polling option should not be counted.
Why? It will not matter which way this poll goes, it wont effect you in any way shape or form. If a vote on something does not effect you, in any way shape or form, then why should your opinion be voiced about it and change what direction it might go in?
THIS IS ALL ABOUT STANDINGS!
Do you have a standing in this poll?> Do you play this game? Y/N?
Answer the above questions please, that is all I ask.
And for that matter let me tell you the verdict.
If you DO play this game, you have a legal opinion on the poll, and you lied about not playing the game.
If you do NOT play the game, then you should not have voted on this poll or had anything to do with it. (Opinions can be voiced, through text, but since you voted you forced a un-wanted//illegal opinion on others.) |
Please, don't vote for a president then. You obviously shouldn't go to the poll booth because you do not partake in the Congressional Hearings or legislation that the judicial and executive branches of our government approve of and put forth. Therefore, according to your fallible logic, all of your votes for anything that you no longer/have never participated in should be discounted. Meaning your vote or presidency, since the presidency itself does not affect you so much as the policies.
Also, why are you talking to someone "who no longer matters?" Why are you requesting this person to answer your ridiculously biased questions? You obviously have a past and you are blatantly attacking him/her as a person or player.
Besides, I don't see how his/her inactivity in-game as a player correlates to his/her experience as a former player. Cum hoc ergo propter hoc.
Also, for the next several pages, the only thing you can attack him/her about is her inactivity and why he/she shouldn't be allowed to have an opinion just because of it. So, yeah, you are attacking him/her. Stop trying to give is a disclaimer that is obviously false by saying you're not attacking him/her. This argument from repetition and appeal to ridicule is openly shows your inability to come up with a justifiable means of nullifying his/her vote and that the only thing you can do is attack this singular point that has little to no reciprocity to the matter at hand.
Therefore, I will no longer comment on your words and actions because they are that of an unlearned sow.
P.S. This is obviously a throwaway account, just in case you want to guess who I am. Also, if you don't understand what I am saying with some of the law terms or don't know the definitions of some of the words I use, go look it up. I'm not teaching a child like you.
P.P.S. You know nothing of legal issues, so stop calling his/her opinion illegal. Opinions are not illegal unless they are slander, and even then, slander cannot be opinionated. Therefore, in all cases, you are wrong. You should stop posting because what you ARE doing is libel. Thanks.
P.P.P.S. Opinions cannot be forced upon others. I guess you shouldn't vote for president then because in my opinion, your vote is illegal since your vote has an effect on me, though it is unwanted. Right? Wrong. What you SHOULD do though: Shut up and think about what you want to say before you say it. You'll realize how dumb you sound. |
Let sleeping dogs lie good sir.
For you are just doing exactly what you're getting after Grandpa Dreadnaught for doing and thats discounting opinions.
Can a thread in these forums ever, EVER stay on topic? I mean seriously people. It's a game, let it be. If people want to argue they need to do it via private messages. This is just making the forums look bad and in turn making the server look bad. |
|
| Wed Jan 26, 2011 4:03 am |
|
| Author |
Message |
RedCladius
Joined: 20 Jun 2009
Posts: 173
|
| Post subject: |
|
|
let Luzz breath guys.
My opinion: remove that mvp room if luzz does not want to remove the crappy mvp from bb
_________________
OG SOS the legendary poodle.
IGN: Watase Miyamoto ; Wenex ; Red Cladius ; KidMoon |
|
| Thu Jan 27, 2011 5:56 am |
|
| Author |
Message |
Kiku-Ichiomonjii
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 1200
Location: Columbus, GA
|
| Post subject: |
|
|
| RedCladius wrote: | let Luzz breath guys.
My opinion: remove that mvp room if luzz does not want to remove the crappy mvp from bb |
stfu u r nubz :[ :[ :[
lol |
|
| Thu Jan 27, 2011 5:59 am |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
